AuguryWhen Money Turns to Code: Cipollone’s Roadmap for Banks, Big Tech and the Next Wave of Payments
This article was written by the Augury Times
A senior ECB voice brings the debate into the open
Piero Cipollone used a high-profile speech to do something simple but important: he said out loud that the shape of money is changing, and that regulators can’t treat the new world as a small tweak to the old one. The tone was clear — technological change in payments and money now touches core public-policy aims such as trust, stability and the way central banks steer economies. For markets, that makes this a strategic story, not just a product update.
The speech mattered because it framed digital money as both a public-policy problem and a market opportunity. Cipollone warned of new private money forms and sketched how public tools might respond. That combination tends to reshape which firms grow fast and which ones face policy limits. Investors should treat the address as a starting gun: choices made in the next few years will decide who captures fees, who loses deposits, and where capital gets reallocated.
How the ECB sees the move from cash to code
Cipollone’s remarks walked through familiar themes — central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), stablecoins, and privately issued money — but with a sharper political edge. The ECB’s job, he said, is to protect the public functions of money: a unit of account everyone trusts, a safe store of value, and a reliable settlement medium. New private forms of money can be useful, but they can also fragment the system or move key levers away from public oversight.
On CBDCs, the message was pragmatic. A digital euro is mainly about giving citizens a risk-free, widely accessible digital option that preserves the central bank’s role. It is not a cure-all — it must be designed to avoid crowding out bank lending or creating new points of failure. On stablecoins and other private money, Cipollone stressed clear access rules: if private money is widely used like cash, it should meet similar standards for safety and oversight.
Crucially for investors, the ECB sees public and private solutions as likely to coexist. That means a mix of regulated public rails, supervised private issuers, and competing technical layers. The balance between public control and private innovation will shape fees, market shares and the profitability of firms that sit on the rails.
The tech that really matters and how it changes incumbents
Cipollone singled out three technology trends that will drive the change: distributed ledger technology (DLT), open APIs, and artificial intelligence. Each shifts costs, speeds and the way trust is built.
DLT promises faster settlement and clearer ownership records. That can shave working capital needs for big firms and erase margins for some intermediaries. Open APIs unlock data and let new services plug into core systems; that shifts value from closed platforms to ecosystems that orchestrate services. AI layers intelligence on top of transactions, improving fraud detection, pricing and customer experience — but it also concentrates advantage with firms that control large, clean datasets.
For incumbents, the challenge is twofold. First, legacy systems and compliance processes are not built for rapid composability. Second, network effects favour whoever runs the rails or controls identity. Firms that modernise quickly and form the right partnerships keep margins; those that move slowly risk being relegated to a commoditised utility role.
What this means for markets: winners, losers and timing
The net picture for investors is mixed but clear in parts. Payments processors and cloud infrastructure providers look well placed because they sit under the new stack and charge for scale. Firms that provide identity, KYC and reconciliation services should also benefit as regulators tighten access rules and demand audited flows.
Traditional retail banks face a tougher test. Their deposit base is an asset, but if private digital money or a CBDC makes it easy for customers to move balances away, banks could lose a cheap funding source. That raises funding costs and chips into lending margins, particularly for smaller regional lenders that lack diversified fee income.
Fintechs are the classic tailwind story: many can scale quickly and win share in niches. But investors should not assume every fintech is a winner. The field is crowded, funding for loss-making growth has proven fickle, and regulatory constraints could force business model pivots. The most attractive targets are those with clear path to profitable scale, sticky customer relationships, and products that plug into settlement or identity rails.
Timing matters. Regulatory moves and infrastructure rollouts take years, so much of the value transfer is a multi-year process. That gives active investors time to position, but it also means there can be sudden re-pricings when policy milestones — pilot results, rule announcements, or major partnerships — arrive.
Regulation, policy risks and where markets could stumble
Cipollone did not gloss over risks. He highlighted three that investors should watch: privacy and data protection, the risk that private money fragments monetary policy transmission, and operational resilience when complex tech layers fail. Regulators are already discussing access rules for accounts, tighter AML and KYC for new issuers, and oversight of tech providers that act like utilities.
For markets, that means outcomes are uncertain. A strict regulatory stance could limit the growth of some private money models and protect incumbent deposit franchises. A lighter approach could accelerate private-sector innovation but leave public authorities scrambling to preserve monetary control. Operational failures or a break in critical infrastructure would be the most immediate market shock — more destructive than most debates about fees or market share.
Practical moves for investors and things to watch next
Think in three buckets. First, favour firms that control rails, identity or infrastructure: they collect fees across many transactions and are harder to displace. Second, be selective among fintechs — prefer those with path to profit, clear regulatory engagement, and partnerships with banks or processors. Third, be cautious on small banks that rely heavily on deposit fees and have little scale to absorb higher funding costs.
Watch a short list of milestones: CBDC pilot results, stablecoin regulatory frameworks, major partnership deals between banks and tech platforms, and new access rules for accounts and payment rails. These signals will move valuations more than quarterly earnings in the near term.
Overall, Cipollone’s speech was a reminder that this is a strategic shift, not a short-term trend. For investors, that means positioning for a multi-year transition that creates durable winners — but also being prepared for policy-driven shocks that can reshape winners and losers overnight.
Photo: RDNE Stock project / Pexels
Sources