AuguryWhen Compliance Officers Start Buying Crypto: What That Shift Means for RIAs and the Market
This article was written by the Augury Times
CCOs going private on crypto could change what RIAs offer their clients
The headline is simple: a fresh survey from the DACFP and the Investment Adviser Association (IAA) says a notable number of chief compliance officers (CCOs) personally own cryptocurrencies. That matters more than it might sound. These are the people who set or approve compliance practices at Registered Investment Adviser (RIA) firms, and their private choices often become the seedbed for public firm policy.
Put another way: when the people responsible for a firm’s rules start experimenting with a new asset class in their own wallets, the firm itself tends to move faster toward permitting, recommending, or at least supporting that asset class for clients. For investors and RIAs, the immediate consequence is a higher likelihood that crypto will move from the sidelines into official product lists, custody arrangements, and client conversations — with practical and regulatory consequences for both advisers and markets.
What the DACFP/IAA survey actually reports — and what it doesn’t
The DACFP/IAA press release says the survey found many CCOs personally hold crypto assets. The release frames the finding as a potential leading indicator: if compliance chiefs are comfortable owning crypto privately, firms may be more willing to add crypto exposure for clients.
That public summary highlights a few points but does not include the full dataset in the headline note I reviewed. The release does not publish the full sample frame or methodology in detail, and it’s unclear from the short announcement how many CCOs responded, how the sample was selected, or how ownership was defined (for example, whether it included stablecoins, tokenized assets, or only major coins). The release also mentions a range of timelines: some respondents say they’ve held crypto for years, others are recent entrants — a sign of both long-term believers and new adopters.
The takeaway: the headline finding is credible in tone — a meaningful group of compliance officers own crypto — but the press note leaves open important questions about scale and representativeness. RIAs and investors should treat the result as an early warning signal rather than a precise market read.
From personal holdings to client flows: how CCO behavior can push markets
When CCOs change their private view of an asset, it often spills over into firm behavior in three ways. First, permissive private views reduce internal friction when advisers want to discuss or recommend an asset: compliance is less likely to block pilot programs, new product launches, or client education initiatives. Second, firms where senior compliance staff are comfortable with crypto are more likely to adopt third-party custody and trading relationships, which lowers frictions for client adoption. Third, a cluster of RIAs opening up to crypto can create measurable flows into markets, because even small- and mid-size advisory firms manage billions collectively.
Practically, that means more client-level demand for spot crypto exposure, tokenized products, and crypto-adjacent strategies. Asset managers and exchanges stand to benefit if advisory channels open up, but institutional-quality custody and clear fee structures will be required to turn private interest into sustained flows. The market impact is likely to be incremental: expect modest but steady inflows to registered products and custodial offerings rather than an overnight reallocation of client portfolios.
Operational and compliance work that RIAs will face
For RIAs, the movement from personal ownership among CCOs to firm-level adoption is not automatic. Practical hurdles are substantial and immediate. Custody is the obvious first issue: advisers need federally regulated, auditable custody arrangements that fit within adviser fiduciary duties. Without custody solutions that satisfy both auditors and clients, many firms will limit crypto exposure to education or noncustodial referrals, which blunts market flow.
Reporting and valuations are the next layer. Crypto prices can swing dramatically and trades can settle differently than securities trades. Advisers must adapt reporting systems for NAV calculation, client statements, and tax reporting. Suitability and client profiling become more complicated when you add highly volatile, speculative exposures. Conflicts of interest also need explicit policies — for example, whether advisers or CCOs may recommend specific exchanges, custodians, or token projects in which they have private interests.
Firms should expect compliance manuals, trade supervision protocols, and onboarding checklists to be rewritten. That will take time and budget, and in many firms the CCO’s private comfort will simply accelerate these conversations rather than instantly change client offerings.
Regulatory catalysts and roadblocks to watch
Regulation remains the single biggest wild card. The SEC has signaled intense interest in how crypto products are marketed and held, and state regulators are also active. Tax treatment is settled in broad strokes — crypto is property for US tax purposes — but reporting standards and enforcement priorities evolve rapidly. Any major SEC guidance that clarifies custody rules or marketing standards for advisers could speed adoption; conversely, enforcement actions or adverse rulemaking would raise compliance costs and likely slow adoption.
Watch for clearer custody standards, enforcement guidance on adviser custody and custody-by-referral arrangements, and any SEC position on token classification. State-level guidance and industry-led custody solutions will also shape the pace at which RIA adoption translates into market flows.
Signals to watch next — what investors and advisers should track
If you want a practical roadmap of whether this soft signal from CCOs turns into real adoption, watch a few near-term indicators. First, announcements of RIA platform integrations with regulated crypto custodians or clearing firms will be an early, concrete sign that advisers are moving beyond discussion to execution. Second, formal policy changes at large RIA firms — updates to compliance manuals, new product approvals, or expanded suitability templates — will show the internal mechanics are being solved. Third, any clarifying guidance or rule proposals from the SEC or major state regulators that touch custody or adviser responsibilities will change the cost-benefit for firms quickly.
In short, the DACFP/IAA survey offers an important early signal: compliance chiefs are privately testing crypto. That reduces one powerful barrier to adoption. But turning private ownership into durable client flows will still require custody solutions, reporting upgrades, and clearer regulatory guardrails. Investors and advisers should treat the survey as a directional nudge — not a market pivot — and watch the operational and regulatory milestones that will turn curiosity into capital.
Photo: Thought Catalog / Pexels
Sources