Security First: Why the White House’s New Strategy Will Rewire Bonds, Gold and Bitcoin

An immediate shift: the security plan that matters to markets

The White House’s new national security strategy puts a hard emphasis on spending — on defence, supply resilience and closer alliances overseas. That may sound like politics, but for markets it is a clear signal: Washington is preparing to spend more, directly and indirectly, and to use fiscal tools as part of national power.

For investors this matters because big, sustained spending changes the landscape for bonds, currencies and real assets. More government spending usually means more debt, and more debt tends to push up long-term interest rates. That, in turn, changes the appeal of gold and other inflation hedges, and it reshapes the risk profile for crypto assets like Bitcoin.

Put simply: this strategy turns security priorities into a macro story. Traders need to treat it like a fresh, structural shove to inflation, yields and safe-haven demand — not a short-lived headline.

How markets will react straight away

First channel: government borrowing. If the plan is backed with real budget increases — more ships, missiles, supply-chain subsidies and allied support — the Treasury will likely issue more bonds over time. That extra supply normally lifts yields, especially at the long end. Higher long-end yields reduce the present value of long-term cash flows, so growth stocks and long-duration assets usually face pressure.

Second channel: inflation expectations. Defence spending and industrial subsidies are not neutral for prices. They create demand for labor, materials and logistics. If the spending is large and sustained, markets will start to price in higher inflation over the medium term. That raises real yields (what investors get after inflation) and pushes money toward assets that protect purchasing power.

Third channel: risk sentiment and safe havens. In a world with heightened geopolitical tension and deliberate engagement overseas, safe-haven flows can spike. That will help assets traditionally seen as safety — US Treasuries, the dollar, gold — in short bursts. But the new twist here is that safety demand will compete with higher supply from Washington. The net effect is messy: expect clearer moves in yields and gold first, and a more volatile reaction in risk markets as traders sort out growth versus inflation.

Finally, central-bank reaction matters. The Federal Reserve will watch both inflation and employment. If fiscal-driven demand pushes inflation beyond the Fed’s comfort zone, the bank may lean toward higher policy rates or a slower easing path. Markets will treat a more hawkish Fed and rising term premium as a recipe for higher real yields and a tougher environment for levered risk trades.

How policy choices translate into macro outcomes

The key macro question is whether the spending comes with offsets. If Congress funds defence increases by cutting other programs or raising taxes, the macro hit is smaller. But if the plan is financed by borrowing or by keeping current tax rules in place, the fiscal impulse is real and durable.

Durable fiscal expansion raises the term premium — the extra return investors demand to hold long bonds instead of short ones. A higher term premium means yields climb independently of short-term rates. That is the component of yields most linked to government debt supply and long-run uncertainty about inflation.

On inflation itself, think of two phases. First, a near-term boost from procurement, hiring and contracts as new programs kick off. Second, a medium-run effect if higher government spending keeps resource use tight. The Fed’s choices matter: if it tightens into rising fiscal demand, growth will slow later; if it looks through some of the fiscal boost, inflation may run higher for longer.

Exchange rates will feel the pressure too. Bigger deficits and higher yields can weaken the dollar on a longer view if foreign investors demand higher risk premia. But in times of geopolitical stress, the dollar often reasserts itself as a safe asset, so expect sharper swings rather than a smooth drift.

Where gold, Bitcoin and bond yields are likely to go

Bond yields: expect upward pressure, especially at the 10- to 30-year area. The balance between Treasury supply and Fed policy will set the path. If the Fed tightens to curb fiscal-driven inflation, short rates will rise too, amplifying the move in yields. For traders, the clearest near-term trade is to assume a higher term premium scenario is more likely than not.

Gold: structurally the story is positive. Gold benefits from higher inflation expectations and policy uncertainty. It is also a direct beneficiary of safe-haven buying in periods of geopolitical stress. That said, gold will compete with higher yields: if real yields rise strongly, the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding gold increases. My view: gold looks like a useful hedge for portfolios — attractive in size and tradeability — because the new strategy raises both inflation risk and geopolitical risk simultaneously.

Bitcoin: the picture is mixed. Bitcoin has been treated by many investors as a speculative risk asset that also serves as an inflation hedge in some regimes. In a world of higher yields and a rising term premium, speculative, rate-sensitive crypto positions face headwinds. At the same time, if fiscal expansion and geopolitical friction deepen distrust in institutions or accelerate payments innovation, Bitcoin could gain narrative support. Frankly, Bitcoin is likely to see bigger swings — more volatility — and its direction will depend on which narrative wins the day: risk-on adoption or risk-off de-risking.

Commodities and cyclicals: expect some sectors to benefit directly — defense suppliers, industrial metals and logistics firms. These are not simple plays, but rising government orders often lift related commodity prices and select equities.

Positioning, risks and practical trade ideas

Where to position depends on your horizon. For short-term traders, the immediate move will be in yields and gold. Expect volatility spikes around fiscal rollouts and budget signals. Traders should watch auction calendars and any statements linking funding to specific programs.

For medium-term investors, this strategy tilts the odds toward higher term premia and more inflation uncertainty. Practical stances that look sensible: overweight gold as an inflation and geopolitical hedge; favour inflation-protected bonds or shorter-duration nominal bonds over long-duration growth exposure; reduce bets that rely on perpetually low long-term rates.

Regarding crypto: treat Bitcoin as a volatility asset for now. If you want exposure, size the position for swings and avoid using leverage that assumes yields will stay low. If you are more bullish on adoption narratives, consider a smaller, conviction-weighted allocation rather than a full substitution for traditional inflation hedges.

Main risks to this view: a rapid political pivot that kills spending plans, a decisive Fed that offsets fiscal stimulus early, or a sudden global shock that flips safe-haven flows dramatically in favor of Treasuries and the dollar. Any of those would change the playbook quickly.

Bottom line: the new security-first strategy is a macro event, not just a political memo. It raises the odds of higher long-term yields and higher inflation risk, supports gold as a hedge, and leaves Bitcoin in a volatile, narrative-driven spot. Traders should price in more upside in yields and more volatility across risk assets, and lean into assets that protect purchasing power and hedge geopolitical risk.

Photo: Karola G / Pexels

Sources