AugurySchick and Skintimate Roll Out Free Razor Recycling With TerraCycle — A Quiet Move That Could Matter for Brand Trust and ESG Scores
This article was written by the Augury Times
Brands launch a consumer-facing recycling option and the message is simple: we’ll take your used razors
Edgewell Personal Care (EPC) this week said it is launching a free recycling program for disposable razors and related packaging under the Schick and Skintimate brands. The program lets consumers send in their used disposable razors and packaging at no cost, using TerraCycle’s collection network. For shoppers who care about waste and for the brands that rely on repeat purchases, the move is a clear attempt to turn a small environmental fix into a broader marketing and trust play.
The announcement is practical rather than dramatic. It doesn’t change how razors are made overnight, but it does give buyers an easy — and free — way to keep used plastic and metal out of household trash. For sustainability-minded consumers, that convenience can matter more than a glossy ad: it’s a direct action that people can take and a visible step the brands can point to in future sustainability reports.
How the recycling program works — what consumers can send and how they participate
The program covers disposable razors and the packaging that comes with them. Edgewell said the service will be free to consumers, who can sign up through the partner’s collection system to ship their used items rather than throwing them away. TerraCycle typically handles sorting and processing for items that local recycling systems won’t accept, and that mail-in or drop-off route is how this program is set up.
Participation is designed to be simple: consumers register, pack up the used razors and packaging, and use the provided instructions to send the materials to TerraCycle. The company will then separate any metals from plastics and route materials to recyclers or reprocessing streams where possible. The program starts immediately, according to the announcement, and is aimed at U.S. consumers at launch; wider availability or international rollouts could follow if participation is strong.
There are limits in practice: bulky or contaminated waste and items not explicitly on the accepted list will likely be excluded. Participation also hinges on consumers bothering to collect and ship small items — the biggest hurdle for most mail-back recycling efforts.
Edgewell’s positioning: brands, partners and what the company says
Edgewell Personal Care (EPC) is positioning the program as a practical step to cut landfill waste from single-use shaving products and packaging. The company framed the effort as part of a broader sustainability push tied to its Schick and Skintimate brands. The program is run with TerraCycle, a known operator in hard-to-recycle waste streams, which gives the rollout operational credibility.
Edgewell is covering consumer costs for shipping and processing, according to the announcement, which removes the financial barrier for customers and makes the program an active benefit of buying the brands. Operationally, TerraCycle will receive, sort and route materials to recycling partners — the model the company has used in similar brand-backed programs.
Investor lens: what this move could mean for brand health, costs and ESG scores
For investors, this is a low-risk, potentially high-reward marketing investment. On the upside, the program can help strengthen brand loyalty among customers who care about sustainability. That matters for razor makers, where repeat purchases and perceived brand responsibility can influence where people spend month after month. A visible recycling program can also support sustainability claims in marketing and in corporate ESG reporting, potentially improving scores that some institutional investors monitor.
The cost side is manageable but not trivial. Covering shipping and processing for returned razors adds an operating expense that will show up in SG&A or sustainability program budgets. For a company the size of Edgewell, the absolute dollar amount is unlikely to move profits materially in the near term. Still, analysts will want to track the program’s take rate — how many customers use it — and the cost per returned unit. If participation is low, the spend looks inefficient; if participation scales quickly, Edgewell will face an increasing recurring expense.
The program also serves as a defensive move against rising regulatory pressure on single-use plastics and producer responsibility laws. Demonstrating a working program can improve the company’s negotiating position with regulators and may blunt consumer criticism, which in turn protects sales. Analysts will watch for mentions of the program in upcoming earnings calls, any shift in marketing spend toward sustainability, and changes to disclosed ESG metrics such as waste diverted from landfill.
TerraCycle’s model and whether this is a big sustainability solution
TerraCycle is widely known for handling items that municipal recycling programs won’t take — from complex packaging to small mixed-material products. Its model relies on centralized collection, sorting and specialized reprocessing. That makes it credible for brand partnerships, but it also means scaling is expensive: shipping small items long distances and processing mixed materials costs money.
Programs like this typically divert waste that would otherwise go to landfill, but they don’t change the physical supply chain for how products are made. In other words, they help manage the symptom — used razors and packaging — rather than removing the source of single-use waste. For regulators and sustainability purists, the ultimate answer is cheaper, recyclable product design and takeback systems with lower per-unit logistics costs. Still, as a consumer-facing step, it is meaningful: not many brands offer a no-cost option for returning small mixed-material items, and that can move consumer perception.
Competitors, rules and what to watch next
Other major consumer goods companies have launched similar programs or pushed recyclable design, and Procter & Gamble (PG) — the owner of Gillette — is the most obvious peer to watch. Competitive responses or matched programs would signal that this approach is becoming a baseline expectation rather than a differentiator.
For investors and sustainability-minded consumers, the short watchlist is simple: participation rates and cost per unit; any mention of the program in Edgewell’s next quarterly results or ESG report; analyst commentary about the program’s marketing value; and regulatory changes on producer responsibility that could raise the financial stakes for takeback programs. Together, those items will tell whether this is a tasteful PR step or the start of a material, ongoing corporate commitment.
Photo: Mikhail Nilov / Pexels
Sources