AuguryRisk-off alarms are flashing in Bitcoin markets even as traders call dips a bargain
This article was written by the Augury Times
A choppy close: bounce refuses to stick
This week ended with Bitcoin sliding after a brief bounce, leaving markets jittery rather than relieved. Price action felt like a tug-of-war: buyers stepped in when volatility spiked, but they did not hold the gains. For traders and allocators, the story isn’t just about a single daily move — it’s that multiple risk-off signals lit up at once, increasing the chance that short-term pain becomes larger cascades.
That matters because many market participants are carrying leverage or concentrated positions. Small moves in either direction can trigger forced selling, widen bid-ask spreads, and make the market less forgiving. In plain terms: the market looks fragile right now, even if some traders are treating recent weakness as a discount.
Which risk-off indicators are flashing and why they matter
Traders follow a handful of simple, repeatable metrics that act like early-warning lights. Right now several of those lights are amber or red.
Funding rates: These show whether leverage-hungry traders pay to stay long or short on perpetual futures. When funding turns strongly negative, shorts pay longs; when it’s firmly positive, longs pay shorts. A fast swing toward negative or neutral funding after a rally suggests speculative longs have pulled back and the broader market is not comfortable reloading.
Exchange flows: Net inflows or outflows to exchanges tell you whether sellers are preparing to exit. Rising inflows often precede price drops because they show supply moving toward venues where it can be sold. This week we saw a pickup in exchange receipts—not panic levels, but enough to erode confidence.
Options skew and put-call balance: Options traders price in tail risk. A persistent demand for puts (insurance) relative to calls lifts implied volatility on the downside and bears can buy protection cheaply by comparison. That skew widened meaningfully, indicating participants are paying more to hedge downside than upside at the moment.
On-chain congestion and stress metrics: Big wallet movements, rising UTXO age (coins changing hands after long dormancy), and declines in miner selling can each signal different pressures. Recently there’s been more movement from large wallets combined with slower inflows to custody providers — a mixed picture that often precedes outsized moves.
In short: funding, flows, options pricing and on-chain signs are all leaning cautious. That doesn’t equal imminent collapse, but it raises the odds of a sharper correction if a new catalyst appears.
Why many traders call sub-$100k a discount — and the caveats
Several active traders and allocators view breaches below $100,000 as buying opportunities. Their argument is simple: supply-side changes, growing spot ETF allocations, and longer-term macro easing should keep a ceiling on the ultimate supply/demand imbalance. Put another way, buyers expect persistent institutional demand to mop up available supply over time.
They also point to historical behavior: after major selloffs, markets often rebound faster than expected when liquidity returns. For short-term traders, a dip can therefore offer attractive asymmetric risk-reward: limited cash outlay with high upside if momentum flips.
But there are real caveats. First, timing matters — being right about long-term direction but wrong on the path can destroy capital if leverage is used. Second, structural risks are still present: higher-for-longer rates, regulatory uncertainty, or a sudden macro shock could sap institutional appetite. Third, the crowd that calls sub-$100k a discount may also be crowded on the same side; that amplifies downside when the first stop-losses trigger.
Scenario check: how Bitcoin might still reach $100k by end-2025
Reaching $100k by the end of next year is still within the realm of possibility. To be useful, we need scenarios with drivers and rough probabilities.
1) Bull scenario — 30% probability. Macro turns friendlier: central banks ease or pause rate hikes, risk assets rally, and liquidity returns. Spot ETF inflows accelerate, and retail interest follows. Technicals flip as funding rates normalize and options skew compresses. In this path, a sustained rally begins in the next few months and gains steam into year-end, pushing price above $100k.
2) Base scenario — 45% probability. Slow grind higher but with frequent pullbacks. Institutional demand continues but at a measured pace; spot inflows are steady, not explosive. Macro does not derail risk appetite, but growth/real rate pressures keep rallies shallow. Price moves toward $80k–$95k by late 2025, and $100k remains possible but requires a late-year catalyst (e.g., another wave of ETF allocations or a surprise policy pivot).
3) Bear scenario — 25% probability. Macro tightening or a big risk-off shock drags risk assets down. Liquidity for risk assets dries up, spot inflows slow or reverse, and leverage unwind accelerates. In this case, the market languishes below $60k and $100k recedes as a realistic near-term target.
Key triggers to watch: central bank commentary and data (inflation and growth), weekly ETF flow reports, shifts in funding and open interest, and large on-chain wallet movements. Any one of these can move the odds materially.
Where leverage and institutional flows sit — why small moves can amplify
Positioning is skewed toward leverage in retail perpetuals and concentrated large spot holdings among a smaller set of institutional wallets. That combination is unstable: retail leverage can blow up quickly when funding flips, while concentrated holdings mean a few big sellers can create supply pressure.
Options markets also compress risk into certain strikes and expiries. Large clustered option positions around key price levels create the potential for gamma-driven volatility — dealers hedge dynamically, which can amplify moves as the underlying price crosses those strikes. The result: seemingly modest price moves can cascade into big volatility spikes.
What investors should consider now: sizing, stops and hedges that make sense
Given the current mix of signals, treat exposure as a risk-managed allocation, not a full conviction bet. For allocators and traders that want exposure while respecting the fragility, here are clear, practical approaches.
Sizing: Keep position sizes modest relative to total portfolio risk. If you would be upset by a 30–50% drawdown in the crypto sleeve, reduce exposure. Think in terms of volatility budget — how much absolute dollar drawdown you can tolerate without forced exits.
Stops and frameworks: Build stop rules around market structure, not round numbers. Use trend breaks or key support levels confirmed by volume and funding, rather than arbitrary percent stops. Allow room for noise but set a clear trigger that limits losses.
Hedging ideas: For defined-risk hedges, buy puts or put spreads to cap downside while keeping upside open. If options are expensive, consider short-dated collars or calendar spreads to reduce cost. For larger institutional books, reduce liquidation risk by staggering sell schedules rather than unloading at once.
Active trade ideas: small tactical buys on confirmed capitulation signals (high vols, heavy outflows then rapid declines in funding), selling call premium into short-lived rallies for yield, or buying protection ahead of known macro events. Each idea should be sized and timed to a clear scenario, not held as permanent insurance.
Bottom line: the market is usable for opportunities, but it is not a safe, one-way bet right now. Respect the risk signals, size conservatively, and use defined-risk tools to participate without handing away the balance sheet to someone else’s forced selling.
Photo: Karola G / Pexels
Sources