Lawmakers Rush to Mark Up Crypto Market-Structure Bill — What Markets Should Watch Next Week

Lummis signals markup next week as Hill staff race to finish a crypto market-structure bill

Senator Cynthia Lummis said on the Senate floor that her committee staff are tired but pushing for a markup of a draft crypto market-structure bill as soon as next week. The short version for markets: a markup this fast raises the chance of quick, headline-driven trading swings in assets that would be reshaped by the law. Expectations of clearer rules tend to lift liquidity and investor demand, while surprises or tougher language can drain flows and widen spreads.

Why a markup matters for tradable crypto assets and trading behavior

A markup is where senators debate, amend and vote on bill text before a committee decides whether to send it to the wider chamber. For tradable crypto assets, that matters because the draft bill — and any changes in markup — could redraw who can legally custody, list and trade tokens.

Markets hate uncertainty. When traders see a clear path to rules, two things usually happen: market makers are likelier to commit capital, and larger institutions become less hesitant about custody and settlement. That tends to compress spreads and increase on-exchange liquidity. The opposite is also true: if a markup adds strict licensing, criminalizes common activity, or leaves custody gaps, some market-makers may withdraw capital and exchanges could restrict listings, pushing volatility higher.

Beyond immediate price moves, the bill can change where trades happen. If the law channels much authority to the SEC or the CFTC, or forces exchanges to register under a new framework, trading volumes could shift to venues that meet the new rules first. That reallocation of flow is often what drives the biggest short-term price moves.

What the draft appears to cover and the likely path through Congress

Reporting on the draft points to several practical areas the bill targets: clearer definitions for assets that are tradable vs. those that are securities, new registration or licensing for trading venues, custody standards for firms that hold customer crypto, and a framework for market surveillance and trade reporting.

Those are big structural pieces. If the markup keeps them intact, the committee will vote on whether to advance the bill to the floor. Even if the committee clears it, the bill still faces a crowded calendar. Amendments in markup can be technical or transformational — and often determine whether the legislation stays bipartisan and politically viable.

So expect a tight timeline: markup next week, possible committee votes within days after, then negotiations over amendments. Real votes on the Senate floor would likely take longer, and final enactment — even if the bill survives the Senate — would require work in the House and possible reconciliation. In short: a fast markup raises the odds of near-term market reactions, but ultimate law remains uncertain.

Who is watching closely — and who will try to shape the text

Senator Lummis is the visible driver, but the outcome will hinge on co-sponsors, committee members, and federal agencies such as the SEC and the CFTC. Industry groups — including the Blockchain Association and consumer-advocacy groups like Coin Center — will lobby hard for friendly definitions and custody-safe harbor provisions.

Major exchanges and brokers will be active behind the scenes. Public companies like Coinbase (COIN) and Robinhood (HOOD) have direct commercial stakes in how trading venues and custody rules are written. Custody specialists and big traditional asset managers, including well-known firms such as BlackRock (BLK), will also push for standards that allow institutional participation without excessive liability.

Expect a flurry of memos and last-minute meetings. Lobbying will focus on narrow but powerful lines: who qualifies as a custodian, what tokens can be listed without triggering securities laws, and what kinds of disclosures and capital requirements trading venues must meet.

Possible markup outcomes and their market consequences

Reasonable scenarios fall into four buckets. First, a softer, industry-friendly markup that clarifies custody and listing rules. Market impact: positive for liquidity and for stocks of public crypto firms; likely to lift major tradable tokens as institutional demand looks safer. Probability: moderate.

Second, a hardened bill that tightens definitions, raises licensing costs, or narrows the tokens that can be traded openly. Market impact: increased volatility, lower liquidity, and short-term price weakness for affected tokens and custody businesses. Probability: material but depends on amendment votes.

Third, targeted carve-outs or compromises — for example, explicit safe harbors for certain custody models or a transition window for existing exchanges. Market impact: patchy — some assets rally, others remain volatile while rules settle. Probability: plausible; often the likely legislative path.

Fourth, delay or procedural stalls that leave uncertainty in place. Market impact: muted immediate relief; volatility persists. Legal risks remain, especially if the bill leaves key questions for regulators to fill in later, which could spawn litigation.

What investors should watch in the next 7–14 days

Amendment text released at the markup: the exact wording on custody and listing rules will move markets fast.
Committee roll-call and statements from floor leaders: these signal the bill’s political support and likelihood of reaching the Senate floor.
Public comments from exchanges and big brokers (e.g., Coinbase (COIN), Robinhood (HOOD)) and major asset managers (e.g., BlackRock (BLK)). Their tone will show whether the industry thinks the text is workable.
On-chain flow metrics and custody inflows/outflows: big withdrawals from exchanges or spikes in stablecoin issuance often preview price stress.
Market microstructure signals: widening bid-ask spreads, dropping market-maker inventory, and rising implied volatility suggest liquidity risk.

In short: fast politics can create fast moves. Investors should watch the text, not just the headlines; small legal phrases can change which firms and assets win or lose. The markup is the start of a high-stakes tug-of-war — and markets will react to how the rope snaps.

Photo: Erik Mclean / Pexels

Sources