Fifth Third Taps Brex to Power a New Commercial-Card Push

A practical deal that immediately boosts Fifth Third’s card reach

Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) has signed a deal with fintech Brex to make Brex the technology provider for its commercial card program. The move is built to have real business impact quickly: Fifth Third gains access to Brex’s card platform, underwriting tools and automation instead of building and owning all of that itself. For Fifth Third shareholders this is a growth play — not a blockbuster acquisition — that should expand the bank’s card volume and fee income while keeping capital and tech spending lower than an in-house build.

For Brex, the deal is a big stamp of approval from a mid-size national bank. It validates Brex’s position as a provider that can handle traditional banks’ regulatory and operational needs while offering modern, AI-driven merchant controls and workflows. The companies are positioning the partnership as a way to capture roughly $5.6 billion in commercial-card volume, a sizeable pool that both sides say will move through the combined product over time.

Exactly what the partnership covers — integration, scale and timing

The agreement covers Brex providing the underlying card technology, issuer processing and customer-facing controls; Fifth Third will keep the customer relationships, deposits and the banking charter. In simple terms: Brex will run the tech, Fifth Third will run the banking and regulatory side.

Public statements peg the addressable commercial-card volume at about $5.6 billion. That figure represents the pipeline of customers and spend the partners expect to migrate or win once the combined product is marketed. It is not one-time revenue; it’s ongoing transaction flow that produces interchange and fees.

On timing, the rollout will be phased. Expect initial integration and pilot customers to appear within months, with broader availability over the next year. The companies have said little about contract length or the exact revenue split. Those commercial terms — especially how interchange and platform fees are shared — are the key unknowns that will determine how much of the $5.6 billion volume translates into meaningful revenue for Fifth Third.

How the deal could move Fifth Third’s revenue, margins and capital plans

At first glance the arrangement looks positive for Fifth Third’s near-term profit picture. By outsourcing technology to Brex, the bank avoids large upfront capital and development costs. That means less pressure on near-term spending and a faster path to earned fees from new card accounts. For investors, faster time-to-revenue beats long, expensive internal builds.

But the trade-off is obvious: outsourcing typically means sharing a slice of fee income with the vendor. If Brex charges a sizable platform fee or takes a generous cut of interchange, the bank’s take rate on each dollar of card spend will be lower than with a fully owned program. The question for Fifth Third is whether the larger total volume and lower operating costs offset the smaller margin per dollar.

Conservatively, the deal should be earnings-accretive over time if the partners deliver the promised customer growth. Near-term P&L may show modest benefit as pilots scale up, then a clearer revenue lift once volume hits stride. Capital impact is limited: because the bank keeps the charter and underwriting risk, regulatory capital follow-through will depend on how much credit exposure Fifth Third assumes on the commercial cards. If the bank underwrites accounts and carries receivables, it will need capital for that; if Brex shoulders more credit risk, capital needs fall but so may margins.

Overall, this is a low-cost, lower-risk way to chase card growth. For shareholders who want visible growth in fee income without heavy investment cycles, that is a sensible outcome — provided the economics are fair and the bank retains control over pricing and risk.

How this fits the bigger trend — banks leaning on fintechs with trade-offs

Banks have been partnering with fintech firms for years to speed product launches and modernize customer experiences. The formula is familiar: banks provide balance sheet, compliance and deposit relationships; fintechs supply slick interfaces, automation and faster innovation cycles. This deal falls squarely in that playbook.

The upside is speed and scale. Fifth Third gets modern card controls, instant issuing and tighter expense management features that are attractive to corporate customers. For Brex, the bank partnership is a route to steady volume and credibility.

But the trade-offs are real. Outsourcing tech creates dependency on a vendor’s roadmap and data handling. Customer data flows through a third party, which raises integration and compliance questions. For a regulated institution like Fifth Third, keeping close oversight of data governance, audit trails and vendor management has to be central. If those controls slip, the bank could face reputational and regulatory costs that outweigh near-term revenue gains.

What investors should watch next

Investors should treat this as a positive tactical move with a few clear variables to monitor. First, watch for announcements about contract length and revenue share — those will tell you how much of the $5.6 billion volume becomes bank revenue. Second, track customer uptake and early performance metrics: card activation rates, average spend per account, and churn will indicate commercial traction.

Also keep an eye on how Fifth Third discloses related tech costs and provisioning in coming quarters. If the bank reports low upfront expenses and rising interchange income, the deal is delivering as advertised. If investor patience is tested, remember the payoff will likely be gradual — but it’s a cleaner, lower-capital route to card growth than building a program from scratch.

Bottom line: this is a smart, pragmatic partnership. It trades some margin for speed and scale, reduces capital headaches, and slots Fifth Third into a competitive product set faster than an internal program would. For risk-aware investors, that’s a net positive — as long as the bank keeps tight control over economics and compliance.

Photo: Aukid phumsirichat / Pexels

Sources