A new marketplace for ZK work: Brevis and Kernel roll out a proving exchange that could reshape who gets paid to build proofs

Brevis and Kernel launch a marketplace to buy ZK proving power — and it matters now

Today two projects pushed a new idea into the growing zero-knowledge stack: Brevis and Kernel announced ProverNet, a marketplace where apps can buy proof work from independent provers. The pitch is simple: instead of apps building or operating heavy proof pipelines themselves, they post jobs and let specialised provers compete to generate the cryptographic proofs. Brevis brings the DePIN-style orchestration and tooling, while Kernel ties the network to one of the largest smart contract ecosystems — BNB Chain — as a security partner and early customer.

This matters because proving — the computational step that turns transactions or state transitions into compact, trust-minimising ZK outputs — is expensive and often a bottleneck for scaling projects and privacy layers. ProverNet aims to make proving capacity a marketable commodity, potentially lowering costs for dapps and L2s, and opening a clearer revenue path for specialised prover operators. For investors in the crypto infrastructure space, the launch raises questions about demand, pricing power for provers, and whether a marketplace can avoid centralization while moving fast enough to be useful.

How ProverNet works in practice: a marketplace for proof jobs

At its core, ProverNet is a matchmaking layer. An application that needs a proof — say an L2 batching service or a privacy app — creates a proof request describing the circuit type, required witness data, latency needs, and payout. That request is broadcast to registered provers, who bid to perform the work.

Provers are operators running proving software and hardware — GPUs and specialized code — capable of producing ZK proofs for particular proof systems. ProverNet supports multiple proof types out of the gate, including common SNARK variants used by L2s and some Plonk-style constructions. The marketplace records bids, matches a prover to the job, and the prover returns the proof within the agreed SLA.

Pricing is market-driven. Provers quote prices tied to compute time, proof size and latency. Settlement happens on-chain where possible: the buyer escrows payment, the prover delivers a proof, and a smart contract releases funds once the proof checks. For trust-sensitive jobs or higher-value work, the system layers in challenge windows and simple verification checks so that buyers can spot incorrect proofs before final settlement.

The user experience targets two groups. Small app teams get a plug-and-play API to submit proof jobs and receive proofs, sparing them from running big clusters. Professional provers get a job feed and reputation system; repeat good performance improves a prover’s access to higher-value work. Brevis packages monitoring, automated retries and basic audit trails so non-experts can use the marketplace with confidence.

Why investors should pay attention: revenue, security and token economics

ProverNet creates a direct commercial path for prover operators to monetize spare compute. For investors, that’s the clearest revenue angle: provers that win work receive fees, and Brevis can take a slice as marketplace commission. If demand scales, especially from L2 rollups and privacy apps, a small number of high-quality provers could earn steady cash flows.

The Kernel partnership ties this marketplace to BNB Chain security. Kernel will route some security-related proving or co-processor tasks through ProverNet as part of its restaking and cross-chain work. That linkage could help bootstrap volume quickly, which matters for marketplace economics: more jobs mean tighter pricing and clearer incentives for provers to invest in hardware.

What investors must watch is whether the marketplace changes token dynamics. Neither Brevis nor Kernel has announced token distribution details that alter supply or staking in the short term. But if the model scales, market participants could demand tokenized incentives for provers or integrate revenue-sharing mechanics. That would create a new layer of token economics to evaluate.

Where ProverNet sits in the proving ecosystem and who it competes with

ProverNet sits between three existing approaches. First, dedicated prover services run by large infrastructure firms or rollups that internalize proving. Second, centralized relays and sequencers that bundle and prove on behalf of apps. Third, emergent marketplaces and DePIN-style networks that aim to decentralize proving work.

The differentiator here is the explicit marketplace design and the Kernel tie-in. That gives ProverNet an advantage for projects already in the BNB Chain orbit or looking for a plug-and-play proving procurement channel. However, it will face stiff competition from cloud-style prover providers that offer tight integration, and from rollups that continue to prefer owning their proving stack to control latency and confidentiality.

Go-to-market will hinge on trust and performance. Buyers care about predictable latency and correct proofs; provers care about clear revenue and low risk of payment disputes. ProverNet’s success depends on its reputation system, technical audits, and early case studies that demonstrate cost and time savings versus self-run proving pipelines.

Key risks for provers, apps and investors

Operational risk is high. Proving is resource intensive; hardware failures, software bugs or mispriced jobs can wipe margins quickly. The marketplace creates slashing-style incentives (rebates or penalties) to deter cheating, but enforcement on complex proofs can be slow or ambiguous.

Centralization is a real danger: if a few large provers control most capacity, they can influence pricing and create single points of failure. That undermines the decentralization promise and raises regulatory attention. Speaking of regulation, large-scale proving services that handle user data or financial state may attract compliance requirements depending on jurisdiction, especially if they cross borders.

Finally, the tech is young. New proof systems, hardware advances, or breakthroughs that change cost curves could upend today’s economic assumptions and shift value away from current prover operators.

Short list of milestones investors should watch

On-chain proof volumes and job throughput from Kernel-related traffic.
Number of active provers and concentration metrics (top-5 market share).
Average price per proof and price volatility over time.
Security audits, dispute statistics and any evidence of incorrect proofs or slashing events.
New partnerships with L2s, privacy apps or major dapps outside the BNB ecosystem.

Photo: Life Of Pix / Pexels

Sources